Can payment behaviour signal harmful gambling?

A hand holding a magnifying glass

Today’s Responsible Gambling strategies typically focus on three areas: 

  • Operator-driven safer gambling tools and resources

  • Government policies and interventions

  • Individual responsibility to practice safer gambling

What if financial institutions were added to the list?

Nathan Lakew, Jakob Jonsson, and Philip Lindner conducted a Delphi study to identify financial indicators that could help evaluate gambling consumption.

Jakob Jonsson, licensed psychologist and one of the researchers behind the article, commented:

While the measures gambling operators take are important, they are inherently limited. An operator can only see a customer’s activity on their own platform, so looking at financial indicators provides a more complete view of the customer.

Jakob Jonsson, PhD and Responsible Gambling expert, at Sustainable Gambling

Thirteen experts weighed in – and reached consensus (80% or higher) on 31 financial indicators across three categories:

    • Person turns up in a debt collector’s registry during a credit check

    • Person asks to be blocked due to a gambling issue

    • Person makes a wager at certain times of day

    • Person requests to restrict betting amount due to self-awareness of problem gambling

    • Person requests help for a gambling problem

    • Multiple payment methods used to make a wager

    • Blaming financial service providers for gambling loss

    • Increase in number of gambling transactions during observation

    • Wagering all wins at once

    • Increasing wager size in a short period of time

    • Bank refused to process a wager due to insufficient funds

    • The use of credit cards for gambling activities

    • The number of cards and/or bank accounts registered

    • Getting lower wager limit than requested due to internal credit check

    • Consecutive increase in wager amount on same gambling site

    • Person continues to wager despite unpaid credit with multiple reminders

    • Cancelling a win payout request

    • Request for raising the budget ceiling

    • Making wagers on multiple gambling sites within 24 hours

    • Person asks for a bonus for gambling

    • Being rude to a customer service agent

    • Arbitrary increase in wager after a steady bet amount

    • Fluctuation in win payouts (high/low)

    • Number of payment reminders from provider

    • Steady increase in wager accompanied by small win payouts

    • One-time arbitrary high bet or bursts of betting

    • A sudden drop in wager after a steady wager increase

    • Request for possibility of setting a budget limit

    • Gambling operator rejects deposit due to hitting time/deposit limit

    • Clear preference for e-wallets/prepaid cards over direct bank deposits

    • Tendency to gamble on high-risk games (e.g., casino games)

Next
Next

Proactive outreach calls – a short and effective intervention to mitigate gambling harm